<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>OpenClaw on WithinTrend — Trending Topics &amp; Guides</title><link>https://withintrend.org/tags/openclaw/</link><description>Recent content in OpenClaw on WithinTrend — Trending Topics &amp; Guides</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator><language>ko-kr</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:25:00 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://withintrend.org/tags/openclaw/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>채널의 진화 — AI 하네스는 결국 접근성 게임이다</title><link>https://withintrend.org/posts/2026-04-30-channel-evolution-of-ai-harness/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:25:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://withintrend.org/posts/2026-04-30-channel-evolution-of-ai-harness/</guid><description>터미널, 메신저, 웹, 그리고 그 다음. 하네스 시장의 진짜 분기점은 성능이 아니라 어디서 부르느냐다.</description></item><item><title>코딩 에이전트 하네스 6종 — 어떤 게 어떤 상황에 맞나</title><link>https://withintrend.org/posts/2026-04-30-coding-agent-harness-comparison/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 10:30:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://withintrend.org/posts/2026-04-30-coding-agent-harness-comparison/</guid><description>Aider, Cursor, Continue, Claude Code, Codex CLI, OpenClaw. 같은 Tool Use 메커니즘 위에서 어떻게 분기했나.</description></item></channel></rss>